Sub-heading: The allure of screens
We live in an era where the glowing rectangle in our hands or on our desks acts as a portal — to entertainment, connection, validation, and distraction. Screens have become more than mere tools: they are altars upon which we place our attention, hopes, and anxieties. The concept of digital shrines captures this ritualistic dimension: we bow before our devices, tap and scroll in repetitive devotion, and expect some kind of reward.

The screen’s allure stems from its immediacy and adaptability. It delivers curated content, facilitates endless novelty, and often gives us a sense of control (we choose what to watch, when to react). And because it’s always present — in pockets, on wrists, in rooms — it becomes a constant companion. This everyday intimacy mirrors religious or ritual objects, giving the screen a shrine-like status in daily life.

Sub-heading: The celebrity phenomenon
Parallel to screens, our society elevates individuals — the celebrities, influencers, public figures — into near-divine roles. We follow their lives, consume their content, emulate their choices. Researchers at Deakin University found that our fascination with celebrities is tied to our desire to understand how to improve our lives. 
Deakin
 The notion of parasocial relationships — one-sided emotional bonds with public figures — shows how we treat celebrities almost like gods or advisors, despite no real reciprocity. 
Wikipedia
+2
PMC
+2

Sub-heading: Algorithms as invisible deities
Beyond screens and humans, there is a more subtle shrine erected to code and logic: the algorithm. The recommendation engine, the news feed, the “for you” page — these are automated gods deciding what we see, think, click, or crave. We trust them, complain about them, chase their favor. Algorithms structure our digital worlds and present themselves as objective truth or inevitable destiny. In this way, our worship of algorithms is even more insidious: we bow not only at the screen, but at the logic behind the screen.

When we speak of “digital shrines,” we encompass all three: the device, the human symbol, and the code. Together they form a triad of modern devotion.

The psychology of worshipping screens, celebrities and algorithms
 

Sub-heading: Identity, validation and belonging
Why do people worship? One classic answer: to belong, to feel seen, to feel powerful. In the modern digital context, the screen offers both connection and projection. We craft digital selves, follow celebrities who define aspirational selves, and let algorithms feed us content that affirms our preferences. The shrine becomes our mirror.

In celebrity worship research, scholars discovered that high levels of obsessive admiration often correlate with low self-esteem, escapism, and problematic internet use. 
PMC
+1
 When our real-life sense of self is uncertain, the shrine of screen, celebrity, or algorithm offers an external source of meaning.

Sub-heading: The dopamine loop and habit formation
From a neurobiological view, screens and their associated feedback loops (likes, shares, notifications) trigger reward circuits. Scrolling, refreshing, seeing something new — all encourage habit formation. The screen becomes sacred because we are wired to seek quick hits of novelty and social validation. Each time we check our phone, we enact a minor ritual: open the shrine, receive a sign, close.

Algorithms accelerate this loop: they learn our preferences and feed us content we like, which reinforces engagement. We begin to worship the shrine of our own attention because it gives us pleasure, even as it may hollow us out.

Sub-heading: Parasocial dynamics and the illusion of control
In the relationship with celebrities (or influencers) we often believe we’re “in” on a friendship, following intimate glimpses of their life, yet the relationship is entirely one-sided. This parasocial illusion gives us a sense of connection without real risk. It’s comfortable worship.

Similarly, we treat algorithms as oracles: if we “feed” them (by clicking, liking, subscribing), they will reward us with better content. We feel like we have control, even when the system is opaque. That opacity is key: we worship the unseen power behind the shrine because it promises to know us better than we know ourselves.

In sum, our shrine-worship behaviour arises from psychological needs (identity, belonging), biological hooks (dopamine/novelty), and structural dynamics (parasociality + algorithmic feedback). Recognising that helps us see why this phenomenon is so pervasive.
 

How screens, celebrities, and algorithms shape our culture
 

Sub-heading: Attention economy and the commodification of self
In a world of abundant information, attention becomes scarce. Screens capture our attention; celebrities exploit it; algorithms monetise it. When we treat our devices like shrines, we are surrendering our attention to external forces. Our time, focus and even emotions become the raw material for advertising, for platform profit, for influencer branding.

As every click, every gaze is tracked, we become commodities. We worship screens — partly because they reward us, but also because they demand us. The shrine asks not only for devotion, but for data.

Sub-heading: The myth of authenticity and curated reality
Celebrity culture thrives on the myth of authenticity — “getting to know the real me” — yet what we see is curated. Similarly, screens present filtered realities. Algorithms select what we see to keep us engaged. Over time, culture becomes shaped by these filtered ones and zeros rather than organic human interaction or communal tradition. We worship images and feeds rather than lived experience.

As researcher Giles and Maltby have shown, celebrity worship can erode personal values and increase social isolation. 
Journal of Chemical Health Risks
+1
 When culture shifts from shared tangible rituals to digital shrines, we lose certain communal bonds and replace them with mediated illusions.

Sub-heading: The algorithmic governance of attention
Algorithms are not neutral. They reflect corporate priorities, monetisation logic, and design choices. By worshipping algorithms (or at least deferring to them), we relinquish agency. Our culture becomes one where the shrine dictates the rules, sets the boundaries, and shapes taste. We consume not only content, but behavioural expectations: how long we should scroll, what we should like, when we should switch. This governance is subtle but profound.

Thus digital shrines are not benign. They restructure culture: they shift focus from face-to-face relations to screens; they shift power from communities to platforms; they sell devotion as engagement. Recognising the cultural consequences is critical.
 

The dangers and downsides of worshipping digital shrines
 

Sub-heading: Erosion of real-life relationships and presence
When we prioritize screens, celebrities and algorithms over in-person connections, we risk weakening our capacity for real intimacy. The screen is always available, controllable, convenient — so we may default to it when things in person are messy. But real relationships demand vulnerability, messiness, waiting. The shrine is tidy, immediate, comfortable.

In turn, overuse of screens has been linked with shortened attention spans, increased anxiety and loneliness. As one article on screens in worship space notes: virtual media can create “prisons without walls” for users. 
Christianity Today
+1

Sub-heading: Identity fragility and external validation
If our identity is tied to celebrity idols or algorithmic feedback (likes, shares, follower counts), then our sense of self becomes fragile. A change in algorithm, a drop in engagement, a shift in celebrity image — all threaten our validation system. The shrine that seemed empowering may become controlling.

Research on the “celebrity worship syndrome” indicates depressive symptoms, emotional instability, and over-identification with a celebrity figure can arise from intense devotion. 
PMC

Sub-heading: Loss of agency and critical thinking
Worshipping algorithms implicitly denies us agency: we believe they know what’s best for us, we follow them unquestioningly. Similarly with celebrity culture: when we place someone on a pedestal, we stop evaluating them critically. The ritual of worship blinds us to manipulation, commodification, and bias.

If we stop questioning why we scroll, why we idolise, what pattern of consumption we’re feeding, we risk handing our attention to forces that don’t have our best interests at heart. The shrine becomes the master, rather than we being the curators of our devotion.

Actionable insights: How to reclaim control in a world of digital shrines
 

Sub-heading: Audit your attention and set boundaries
Begin by conducting an “attention audit.” Track how much time you spend in front of screens, how often you check social media, how you emotionally respond when you don’t have your device. Recognise the shrine form.

Then, set clear boundaries: designate screen-free times (meals, before bed, awake morning hours), and screen-free zones (bedroom, dinner table). Consider switching off or limiting notifications so the shrine doesn’t constantly call you.

Sub-heading: Cultivate analog rituals and presence
If screens and celebrity worship are digital rituals, we can rebuild analog ones. Spend time without devices: reading physical books, walking without music/podcasts, engaging in conversation without checking phones. Creating rituals of presence helps recalibrate attention away from the shrine.

Also nurture face-to-face connections. Real friendships, conversations without a filter, mutual vulnerability — these act as counter-shrines to digital idols and code. They ground you in human rather than algorithmic logic.

Sub-heading: Develop critical awareness and choose devotion
Recognise that screens, celebrities and algorithms are not inherently evil, but powerful. Ask: what am I giving my attention to? Why do I follow this person? Why does this algorithm’s recommendation matter? What is its motive?

Rather than passively worship, become consciously selective. Choose what you give your attention to. Unfollow, unsubscribe, mute influences that drain you. Support creators who empower you. Use algorithms with intention, not submission. In this way you reclaim agency rather than being the worshipper of a digital shrine.